Following several requests here is the complete (as far as I’m aware)
KHANI JANUARY COURT DIARY.
Tues Jan 11th -Court 6,Magistrates Court (upstairs,hard left [city end] & the only Court facing Liverpool St. Quite a few seats available-The Anti-Discrimination case against me by Mr K has been long relished.
Wed Jan 12th -Anti Discrim case
Thur Jan 13th -Anti-Discrim listed to continue.
Thur Jan 13th -Anti-Discrim listed to continue.
-he is listed in another Court room for trial date allocation on charges of:-
a) Damage Property,& b) Breach of Restraint Order
Fri Jan 14th -also listed for Anti-Discrim hearing
Thur Jan 20th -his trial on charge of Dishonestly Acquiring a Financial Advantage,also in Magistrate Court.
Fri Jan 21st -his Dishonestly Acquiring case listed to conclude
Mon Jan 31st -he listed to Plead & likely trial date allocation on 4 HCC Complaints:-
a) Breach of S.85 (1) Building Act [re Unit 1,161 Bathurst St],
b) Breach of S.63 (2) (c) the Land Use Planning & Approvals Act [unit 1],
c) Breach of S.121 Building Act [carried out building work (effecting the residents of 138 Melville without notifying them),andd) Breach of S.127 Building Act (carried out work effecting neighbours without their agreement)
In ADDITION on Mon Dec 20th he is appearing before the Resource Management & Planning Appeal Tribunal at a Directions type hearing that may set a date for the hearing of an HCC application (now joined by Tom & Kerrie Berger) for an Order that (inter alia) all work at Unit 1,161 Bathurst St that has been carried out contrary to the planning permit be demolished.
His HISTORY with Building,etc matters in the last 4 years includes:-
1.Glenorchy Council v him TASRMPAT 219 (Oct ’06)
He was ordered to apply for a planning permit for a block wall he had erected on Main Rd & Regina St within 7 days;if not done or if a permit not granted he Ordered to demolish the wall.
He Ordered to construct a solid panel to interrupt the “original planter which has been removed from the front window”
He Ordered to re-install a Dry Cleaning sign on the Main Rd facade & box around it.
2.Him v HCC TASRMPAT 1/7/09
He did work at 33 Marlborough St without a permit.
The Council acted.
He then applied for a permit.
This was an Appeal by him against the permit conditions then granted.
The decision includes these words-
-“the development application…sought approval for work already carried out”,
-“eventually after a protracted & somewhat tortuous process,this appeal came on”,
-“no evidence,at all,or any material was filed on behalf of [K]”
(with one small exception the Appeal was dismissed)
3.HCC v him TASRMPAT 169 26/8/09
This gave him 6 months (expiring in Jan 2010) in respect of 33 Marlborough St to:-
-remove the fill dumped there,
-reinstate any excavation works.
-submit a vegetation management plan for revegetation of the property,&
-within 21 days of approval of a vegetation plan-carry out that work
{the property has a condition prohibiting vegetation or ground disturbance except in a small building envelope}
{it would seem that this has been ignored & repeated attempts made to sell it}
{no enforcement action appears to have been taken as yet by the HCC}
4.About October 2009 HCC prosecuted him for breach of s.170 Building Act re 178 Brisbane St. He eventually pleaded Guilty about June 2010 & was fined.
5.About November 2009 HCC prosecuted him for breach of S.170 Building Act re 44 Bay Rd,Newtown.
He eventually pleaded Guilty mid 2010 & was fined.
6.About November 2009 HCC prosecuted him for breach of S.170 Building Act re 157-161 Bathurst St.
He eventually pleaded Guilty mid 2009 & was fined.
Happy Christmas & a Great New Year,
Tony
No comments:
Post a Comment