Mehrab-Khani's property Harrington 102 has picked up another bad review, and this one is a beauty. The reviewer mentioned that she is taking this to Consumer Affairs and the Ombudsman.
The accommodation facility seems to be taking a downward spiral with more bad reviews in a shorter time than ever before, coupled with increasingly angry people.
Here is the latest review, 3 March 2012 on Trip Advisor:
"Absolutely Disgusting Doesn't Even Deserve A Rating!!!!!!!
I booked 2 rooms via the net, 1 for 2 nights and 1 for 1 night, according to it there were only "compact" rooms available for the nights we wanted, apart from 1 balcony room which was something like $180 per night.
WELL, compact is the understatement of the century.... couldn't open the door and get into the room if the bathroom door was open,unless you were super skinny, NO window only glass bricks where one should be, heat pump, thank god, which we put onto air con so that we had some air circulating.
Bathroom advertised as marble, woopy do, so tiny, no face washers or hairdryer, you could hardly move in the shower. IN our other room, it stank,it smelt like the sewer, to put it politely, even room deodoriser didnt help...
Back to the room itself, couldnt stretch out your arm when in bed because the wall was in the way, lucky to be 8 inches each side of the bed, so no bed side tables, the heat pump was plugged in by an extention cord, I had to unplug that to plug in the so called, bedside lamp, which was stuck on the wall and didnt even work.
It was dirty and mouldy in places,you could see where things had been taken off walls but hadnt been repaired or painted, the phone to get intouch with reception, didnt work in either room.
The tiny jug of milk in the fridge in one of the rooms, had a film on it, so no saying how long it had been in there for. We should have gone and complainedt, and I dont know why, but didnt...
Our biggest concern was that the was only 1 way in and out of the building, via the stairs, oh yes we had to drag ourselves and luggage up 4 flights of stairs, NO LIFT. With NO window in the room, and only the stairs, WHAT IF THERE WAS A FIRE???? How the hell do you get out ??????? IS THAT LEGAL???
The only concelation was that the mattress was comfy, there was certainly nothing else even remotely good about the Harrington. I wouldn't even let my dogs stay there, their bed is bigger than our whole room was. oh and cleaner......
We couldnt put up with it for the second night, So we decided to book into something better, being to polite and embarrassed to say the real reason that we werent staying the second night, god only knows why, I told the lady at reception, who is not professional at all, that I was sick and we had to leave.
I had paid up front for the two nights, and knew that there was a cancellation fee, but apon asking for my money back, which was only for 1 room for the second night, i was told that you have to give 72 hours notice, um a bit hard when you have already been there 1 night.
I could have got into a real doozy of an argument, but the stupid impolite woman on the other side of the counter was getting very agro with me, so I kept my cool and told her that that is just not right, to put it in terms that I can put in print. Her excuse was that she wouldnt have time to readvertise the room on the net.
This happened before checkout time and check in isnt before 2pm... It was supposed to be nearly booked out but we only saw 2 other people there and they were in the room next to ours.
When we got back to our room the first night at about 12.30am their door was chocked open with the rubbish bin. Very strange, were they too claustrophobic to sleep with their door shut???
No parking, on the street in front if your lucky, which means putting money in the meter all the time, or round the corner theres a small car park you can pay $9 for all day, but only once all the workers have left to go home so that theres space...
I could go on and on and its all BAD, I intend on taking this further with consumer affairs and the ombudsman if need be to try and get our money back for the second night, that stupid inpolite receptionist,cleaner,manager what ever she is meant to be, could do with getting intouch with a good PR company to learn how to run the place properly.
AND if there is another owner of this disgusting establishment, you need to get rid of her... Anyway, we had REAL luxury accommodation the second night at The Wool Store, it was absolutly beautiful.
You could do with going there lady and having a look and learn what true luxury accommodation is and how to treat people.... MY ADVISE IS TO NEVER STEP FOOT OVER THEIR PRETENTIOUS MARBLE FRONT STEPS......."
http://www.tripadvisor.com.au/Hotel_Review-g255097-d300914-Reviews-Harrington_s_102-Hobart_Tasmania.html
Monday, March 5, 2012
Monday, February 27, 2012
No Sale Of Khani Properties
On February 25th the only bid for 157 BATHURST ST at auction was one of $200,000.
Despite it having been advertised recently by George Self Real Estate as a “Must Sell” auction,the auctioneer first bid $250,000 & then $340,000 on behalf of Mr Khani and then passed it in to deal with the $200,000 bidder.
That bidder left without anything being agreed. No mention was made by the Auctioneer of the Warning recently placed on the Title by the Hobart City Council as to inadequate fire separation between this house & No.159.
HARRINGTON’S 102 (accommodation Facility) was recently offered for sale with tenders closing on Feb 3rd.
It remains unsold & has picked up 2 more bad reviews in the last week (see last post).
159 BATHURST ST continues to be advertised for sale “offers over $450,000. The Agents ad says it has 483 sqm. The Title Deed 163295/5 shows that it has only 226 sqm.
33 MARLBOROUGH ST, SANDY BAY has seen no action to comply with the Planning Appeal Tribunal Order to remove fill dumped there & to re-vegetate as native bush land.
It was listed for Sale for about a year by George Self Real Estate (now closed). It is now listed by Falls but wrongly referred to as No.3 Marlborough, ”inspections by appointment only”.
178 BRISBANE ST
This has been effectively made into 2 flats complete with big shiny Unit 1 & 2 letter boxes put in by Mr Khani.
Now Mr Khani has applied to the Hobart City Council for permission to convert it into 2 flats. He has told the Council that he plans to then have it Stratum Titled into 2 units. Two separate sales attempts are then likely.
One neighbour has lodged objection alleging 14 instances of non-compliance with the Hobart Planning Scheme & 3 of non-compliance with the Australian Building Code.
Watch this space.
Despite it having been advertised recently by George Self Real Estate as a “Must Sell” auction,the auctioneer first bid $250,000 & then $340,000 on behalf of Mr Khani and then passed it in to deal with the $200,000 bidder.
That bidder left without anything being agreed. No mention was made by the Auctioneer of the Warning recently placed on the Title by the Hobart City Council as to inadequate fire separation between this house & No.159.
HARRINGTON’S 102 (accommodation Facility) was recently offered for sale with tenders closing on Feb 3rd.
It remains unsold & has picked up 2 more bad reviews in the last week (see last post).
159 BATHURST ST continues to be advertised for sale “offers over $450,000. The Agents ad says it has 483 sqm. The Title Deed 163295/5 shows that it has only 226 sqm.
33 MARLBOROUGH ST, SANDY BAY has seen no action to comply with the Planning Appeal Tribunal Order to remove fill dumped there & to re-vegetate as native bush land.
It was listed for Sale for about a year by George Self Real Estate (now closed). It is now listed by Falls but wrongly referred to as No.3 Marlborough, ”inspections by appointment only”.
178 BRISBANE ST
This has been effectively made into 2 flats complete with big shiny Unit 1 & 2 letter boxes put in by Mr Khani.
Now Mr Khani has applied to the Hobart City Council for permission to convert it into 2 flats. He has told the Council that he plans to then have it Stratum Titled into 2 units. Two separate sales attempts are then likely.
One neighbour has lodged objection alleging 14 instances of non-compliance with the Hobart Planning Scheme & 3 of non-compliance with the Australian Building Code.
Watch this space.
Friday, February 24, 2012
Harrington 102--More Bad Reviews
Mebrab-Khani's accomodation facility (it's not a Hotel) has been collecting more bad reviews from Trip Advisor.
That's two bad reviews in a week, following bad ones in January and December 31st as well. It has also been ranked at 40/41 accommodation facilities in Hobart. However number #41, Marquis at Brisbane Street, has no reviews at all!
It would appear to me that Wotif should be notified about false advertising of the Harrington 102 relating to the word "luxury" when perhaps "frugal" would be more appropriate based on the photo's and reviews from Trip Advisor.
"Zen Minimalist
Minimalist says it all about this hotel. It has no service, no lift, no furniture in the room and no windows. The sole staff member acts as receptionist, cleaner and kitchenhand.
The free cereal and toast breakfast was the only positive. Treat as a last resort only."
"Not Luxury
Stayed here on a Wofif deal. Advertises as luxury but in no way is. Small room and the bathroom is nicer than the room. Very noisy. Can hear others showering loudly and clearly.
Apparently there is a breakfast. Did not ask. Figured may have to pay given the wotif mystery deal and may as well have it at the Qantas Club. Would not stay here again. Better off to pay a bit more and get a lot more."
That's two bad reviews in a week, following bad ones in January and December 31st as well. It has also been ranked at 40/41 accommodation facilities in Hobart. However number #41, Marquis at Brisbane Street, has no reviews at all!
It would appear to me that Wotif should be notified about false advertising of the Harrington 102 relating to the word "luxury" when perhaps "frugal" would be more appropriate based on the photo's and reviews from Trip Advisor.
"Zen Minimalist
Minimalist says it all about this hotel. It has no service, no lift, no furniture in the room and no windows. The sole staff member acts as receptionist, cleaner and kitchenhand.
The free cereal and toast breakfast was the only positive. Treat as a last resort only."
"Not Luxury
Stayed here on a Wofif deal. Advertises as luxury but in no way is. Small room and the bathroom is nicer than the room. Very noisy. Can hear others showering loudly and clearly.
Apparently there is a breakfast. Did not ask. Figured may have to pay given the wotif mystery deal and may as well have it at the Qantas Club. Would not stay here again. Better off to pay a bit more and get a lot more."
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
HOBART COUNCIL WARNING RECORDED ON TITLES OF COTTAGES TO BE AUCTIONED
For about a month the 2 wooden cottages owned by Soheil M Khani at 157 & 159 Bathurst St were listed for auction by Geo Self Real Estate on February 11th.
That business has announced that it is ceasing property sales this month. Each cottage was advertised as "must sell".
Now the auction date for No.157 has been delayed to Feb 25th & 159 has returned to being listed as for sale by offer. The Stratum Title for each was issued on 23.1.2012 & are No. 163295/6 & 163295/5 respectively.
On page 3 of Strata Plan 163295 the Hobart City Council has recorded this warning about these 2 properties-
Our enquiries reveal that under the Building Act the Council General Manager can:- -under Section 166,declare a building to be a "fire hazard":
-under Section 166 (2) (b),state a program for work to overcome the fire hazard,&
-under Section 167, require an owner to show cause...why specified upgrading work should not be carried out.
Specific Council plans are not known. Prospective bidders should perhaps urgently check with the Council.
The only way to make the cottages compliant with the safety requirements of the Building Act may be construction of a fire wall between them which would likely involve partial deletion of the side of at least one of the cottages.
That business has announced that it is ceasing property sales this month. Each cottage was advertised as "must sell".
Now the auction date for No.157 has been delayed to Feb 25th & 159 has returned to being listed as for sale by offer. The Stratum Title for each was issued on 23.1.2012 & are No. 163295/6 & 163295/5 respectively.
On page 3 of Strata Plan 163295 the Hobart City Council has recorded this warning about these 2 properties-
WARNING
Our enquiries reveal that under the Building Act the Council General Manager can:- -under Section 166,declare a building to be a "fire hazard":
-under Section 166 (2) (b),state a program for work to overcome the fire hazard,&
-under Section 167, require an owner to show cause...why specified upgrading work should not be carried out.
Specific Council plans are not known. Prospective bidders should perhaps urgently check with the Council.
The only way to make the cottages compliant with the safety requirements of the Building Act may be construction of a fire wall between them which would likely involve partial deletion of the side of at least one of the cottages.
Monday, February 6, 2012
"Rude Staff" at Harrington 102. Latest Review
Starting off the New Year with another review from Trip Advisor for Mehrab-Khani's Harrington 102. As mentioned before, he is trying to sell this property.
"Disappointed
My partner found the staff to be a bit rude and did not explain things such as the "trick" opening the door. Room was ok but bathroom was way yoo small. Balcony room was supposed to have harbour views but only saw rooftops and cranes. No car parking so metered parks were her only option."
The latest review has him as "rude", certainly no surprise to me since he tried to stick his thumb in my eye and threaten me for attempting to take photo's of his illegal development modifications.
This photo of his thumb is one of several used used in Court against him where he was convicted of breaching a Restraint Order I had against him.
Notice in the review that the Balcony Room was supposed to have views but didn't. In fact on the Wotif site, this room is stated to have "beautiful views overlooking city and mountains."
The Trip Advisor link is here:
http://www.tripadvisor.com.au/Hotel_Review-g255097-d300914-Reviews-Harrington_s_102-Hobart_Tasmania.html
Mehrab-Khani has a history of unsavoury business practice as documented on this site.
"Disappointed
My partner found the staff to be a bit rude and did not explain things such as the "trick" opening the door. Room was ok but bathroom was way yoo small. Balcony room was supposed to have harbour views but only saw rooftops and cranes. No car parking so metered parks were her only option."
The latest review has him as "rude", certainly no surprise to me since he tried to stick his thumb in my eye and threaten me for attempting to take photo's of his illegal development modifications.
This photo of his thumb is one of several used used in Court against him where he was convicted of breaching a Restraint Order I had against him.
Notice in the review that the Balcony Room was supposed to have views but didn't. In fact on the Wotif site, this room is stated to have "beautiful views overlooking city and mountains."
http://www.tripadvisor.com.au/Hotel_Review-g255097-d300914-Reviews-Harrington_s_102-Hobart_Tasmania.html
Mehrab-Khani has a history of unsavoury business practice as documented on this site.
Monday, January 16, 2012
Khani Paid His Lawyers After Judgement But Before Enforcement Proceedings
The legal firm of Gunson Williams sued Soheil.M.Khani in May 2011 for fees due them in respect of legal advice & legal representation.
He was their former client but they had made it clear that they would not further act for him. The largest item was over $9,400 being the balance owing for representation on a Criminal charge.
A previous payment believed to have been at least $5,000 had been paid. A further sum of in excess of $1,700 was for advice in respect of Hobart City Council prosecutions. The fees for advice on 2 civil matters totalled over $1,800 & there was $289.30 for advice re a Judgment by Mr T.Jacobs for the smashing of his windscreen.
That advice was on June 3rd 2010 & cost Mr Khani nearly three-quarters of the $405 damage. Mr Khani then paid the Bailiff the total sum due being $689.50, bringing his total outlay to $573.80 + the $405 that had been politely requested originally.
The point did not get through to Mr Khani who subsequently did not pay Gunson Williams.
On June 2nd 2011 he was served by a Process Server who attached to his Affidavit, 2 photographs of Mr Khani apparently scuffling with someone on a public street. No response having come from Mr Khani, a Judgment by Default was filed on June 24th which raised the costs by over $100 to above $600.
Gunson Williams then faced the problem that a Caveat over most of Mr Khani’s properties lodged by the Hobart City Council remained.
It seems that a communicated threat to him did the trick.
Mr Khani finally paid the Council. It withdrew it’s Caveat 3 days later on June 27th. Gunson Williams advised the Court on July 11th that they’d been paid.
He was their former client but they had made it clear that they would not further act for him. The largest item was over $9,400 being the balance owing for representation on a Criminal charge.
A previous payment believed to have been at least $5,000 had been paid. A further sum of in excess of $1,700 was for advice in respect of Hobart City Council prosecutions. The fees for advice on 2 civil matters totalled over $1,800 & there was $289.30 for advice re a Judgment by Mr T.Jacobs for the smashing of his windscreen.
That advice was on June 3rd 2010 & cost Mr Khani nearly three-quarters of the $405 damage. Mr Khani then paid the Bailiff the total sum due being $689.50, bringing his total outlay to $573.80 + the $405 that had been politely requested originally.
The point did not get through to Mr Khani who subsequently did not pay Gunson Williams.
On June 2nd 2011 he was served by a Process Server who attached to his Affidavit, 2 photographs of Mr Khani apparently scuffling with someone on a public street. No response having come from Mr Khani, a Judgment by Default was filed on June 24th which raised the costs by over $100 to above $600.
Gunson Williams then faced the problem that a Caveat over most of Mr Khani’s properties lodged by the Hobart City Council remained.
It seems that a communicated threat to him did the trick.
Mr Khani finally paid the Council. It withdrew it’s Caveat 3 days later on June 27th. Gunson Williams advised the Court on July 11th that they’d been paid.
Khani Attempting To Sell Harrington 102!
It seems that the Harrington 102 is up for sale.
It has been listed in the Mercury Real state booklet of January 12th. On page 70 Colliers state: "contemporary magic - stunning design".
It has been listed as For Sale by expression of interest, closing Feb 3rd.
It has been listed in the Mercury Real state booklet of January 12th. On page 70 Colliers state: "contemporary magic - stunning design".
It has been listed as For Sale by expression of interest, closing Feb 3rd.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
